01-33
NEW RIVER VALLEY PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
Minutes of the Commission Meeting
held on April 26, 2001
New River Valley Competitiveness Center, Fairlawn, 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chairman Gerald called the meeting to order with 17 members present.
PRESENT: Mr. F. Gerald, Chairman, Floyd County; Mr. S. Weaver, Treasurer, Town of Christiansburg; Mr. D. Burdette, Radford University; Mr. T. Garrett, Town of Narrows; Dr. H. Harvey, City of Radford; Mrs. E. Janney, Floyd County; Dr. A.T. Leighton, Town of Blacksburg; Dr. J. Moore, Vice-Chairman, Montgomery County; Mr. T. Owens, Pulaski County; Mrs. A. Perkins, Montgomery County; Mr. J. Sheffey, Pulaski County; Mr. R. Shelor, Town of Floyd; Mr. T. Starnes, City of Radford; Mr. C. Stewart, Town of Pulaski; Mr. S. Stewart, Town of Pearisburg; Mr. B. Stipes, Town of Christiansburg; and J. B. Sutphin, Alternate, Virginia Tech.
ABSENT: Dr. M. Chandler, Town of Blacksburg; Mr. J. Lovely, Town of Rich Creek; Mr. L. Light, Giles County; Mr. J. Phillips, Virginia Tech; Dr. J. Randolph, Town of Blacksburg; Mr. H. Spencer, Giles County; and Mr. J. Weddle, Town of Pulaski.
II. APPROVAL OF MARCH MINUTES
Chairman Gerald asked if there were any questions or additions to the March minutes.
Motion: Mr. Sheffey moved that the March minutes be approved as presented. Mr. Stipes seconded the motion.
Action: Motion carried unanimously.
III. CHAIRMAN�S REPORT
Chairman Gerald stated he had nothing to report.
IV. REVIEW OF MUTUAL CONCERNS AND COMMISSIONERS� REPORTS
There were none.
V. TREASURER�S REPORT FOR MARCH
Mr. Weaver presented the Treasurer�s Report for March. He asked if there were any questions or additions to the March Report.
Motion: Dr. Leighton moved that the Treasurer�s Report for March be approved as presented. Mr. Starnes seconded the motion.
Action: Motion carried unanimously.
01-34
VI. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR�S REPORT
Mr. Rundgren reported on the following items:
EDA Visit of April 13, 2001 - Representatives from EDA visited and reviewed Vision 2020 multi-media, GIS, and WEB pages.
Regional Competitiveness Partnership Meeting - The meeting will be held on May 15, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. in Room 208, Edwards Hall, New River Community College.
New River Valley Revolving Loan Fund - EDA Grant application is under review.
Transportation - Grant Application for model of arterial system was not approved. Patrick Burton has returned to the PDC as Transportation Planner.
Commission Vehicle - The PDC has been offered $200.00 for the Chevrolet Cavalier station wagon. It was the consensus of the Commissioners that the offer be accepted.
VII. PUBLIC ADDRESS
There was none.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
There was none.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consideration of FY 01 Revised Budget
Mr. Rundgren presented the revised budget for FY 01. He stated that the majority of the change has to do with the Army deciding not to update their strategic plan through the Commission.
Motion: Dr. Moore moved to accept the FY01 Revised Budget. Mr. Burdette seconded the motion.
Action: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Discussion of FY 02 Budget Schedule
Mr. Rundgren stated that the FY02 Budget will be presented at the May meeting, however discussion and approval will take place at the June meeting.
01-35
C. Discussion of EDA Representatives� Visit to the May Commission Meeting
Mr. Rundgren explained that the newly appointed Assistant Secretary and staff of House Budget Committee will be conducting a field visit at the May Commission Meeting. They will be in the area by 5:00 p.m. He asked how the Commissioners would like to handle their arrival. It was suggested that a reception be held at 6:15 p.m. prior to the meeting. It was suggested that name tags be provided for the Commissioners.
D. New Project for the 2000 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
Mr. Rundgren stated that the Revolving Loan Fund, which as approved at the March meeting, needs to be added to the CEDS. When ranked using the Project Evaluation Criteria from the 2000 CEDS, this project scored 31 points, making it the highest ranking project on the list.
E. Review Goals & Objectives, Work Session on 2001 CEDS
Mr. Rundgren stated that the goals and objectives were provided in the Commission packet. He asked that everyone study these and make any recommendations for changes. A work session will be held at the May meeting. In reviewing the goals and objectives take into consideration the state of regional money, external trends, partnering for economic development, and resources for economic development.
Mr. Garrett asked if the effectiveness of the process is determined by job rate. Mr. Rundgren stated it is based on jobs, facilities, and infrastructure pieces.
Mr. Shelor stated that when you measure the needs then the process is liquid from there on.
Mr. Burdette asked what is the NRV Visitors Bureau. Mr. Rundgren stated that is came about from the Alliance.
Dr. Harvey stated that communities have one single focus, but couldn�t the NRV come together and say "this is who we agree to be".
Mr. Rundgren stated that not every locality has a need all at the same time.
Mr. S. Stewart stated that there are too many statements about controlling development. This does not encourage jobs.
Ms. Perkins stated that there needs to be a restructuring of the tax base.
01-36
X. COMMONWEALTH INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
Department of Conservation and RecreationA. Continuation or Renewal Projects (Signed-off by the staff)
1. Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grant Workplan for FY 02 -
2. FY 2001 Pollution Prevention Initiative for States - Department of Conservation and Recreation
B. Regular Project Review
1. Pre-application for Commonwealth Airport Funding - Virginia Tech Airport
2. Blacksburg Industrial Park Expansion - Montgomery County
C. Environmental Project Review
1. Modification of VPDES Permit, Lower Stroubles Creek STP - Department Environmental Quality
Chairman Gerald asked if anyone wished to discuss any of the projects separately.
Motion: Mr. Starnes moved that all of the projects be found not in conflict with regional plans, policies, and goals. Mr. Sheffey seconded the motion.
Action: Motion carried unanimously.
There being no further business, there was a consensus that the meeting be adjourned.
____________________
Fred Gerald, Chairman
New River Valley Planning District Commission
If you have any questions or comments regarding this page, please e-mail [email protected]
Last Edited:
5/24/01